Master’s Degree Done
I’m officially done with my Master’s degree in Instructional Technology. My degree posted June 2010. It was a long haul, but it was worth it.
I’m officially done with my Master’s degree in Instructional Technology. My degree posted June 2010. It was a long haul, but it was worth it.
Date: June 6, 2009 from 12 p.m. to 8 p.m.
Hours: 4 (other 4 hours pure research)
Activities:
Date: June 5, 2009 from 12 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Hours: 10
Activities:
Okay, I’ve got to call it a day as my eyes are hurting.
Date: June 4, 2009 from 12 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Hours: 10
Activities:
June 3, 2009 from 12 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Hours: 6
Activities:
To Do:
Okay, I submitted my IRB application to Dr. Newberry this week; hopefully, I filled it out correctly as I couldn’t get past the 10 minute marker in the video. I wrote about this in Kenny’s blog. I feel that my project, being a design and development type project, really doesn’t fall into the research-centric protections of the IRB proposal, but I could be wrong. We’ll see.
I also listened to the informative interview with Barb Kouba, which made me think of my previous line of work prior to teaching. Her tenet that assistive technologies need to be more integrated into all education classes, not to mention special education, is an insightful examination into the apparent lack of understanding of these technologies by most teachers/professors. When I first moved to Chicago, I worked at a summer camp, and continued this work for three years, for adults with Cerebral Palsy. This work, and my later work with Autism and mental retardation, really opened my eyes to the lack of technologies geared specifically for these individuals. At the camp, many of the individuals couldn’t speak and communicated through speech boards where they pressed a picture and the board said the word; yet, these boards seemed archaic and so extremely limited. After all, these Fisher-Price looking boards only had maybe twenty words on them. These men and women I worked with wanted to converse but were often impeded by the technology to have fluent conversations, which amounted to great perceived frustration on their parts. While I’m sure there was even more advanced technology available in the early 90′s when I worked at the camp, I also know that the technologies were probably cost prohibitive for these individuals as many of them lived in nursing homes and other state-assisted living environments. In fact, I clearly remember wanting to build low cost devices to help these individuals communicate more efficiently as I was frustrated with their “toy” type devices they had. This notion is still in the back of my mind as I have ventured farther into the open source world. On a side note, I wish Barb’s website would load as I would love to explore more about her thesis and results from that thesis.
Well, I guess back to trying to get together my prototype for this class.
Okay, I have watched the three videos for the IRB and completed all my CITI modules. I’m not quite sure about the two hour time on this as the movie took one and half hours to watch and the CITI modules took quite a bit more than two hours. Now, I need to complete the IRB application, which sounds like I will qualify for exempt status due to the nature of my project. I’m glad you could retake those CITI modules to get to the 100%
. I also completed my Master’s Proposal, as Kenny pointed out on his blog, “relying heavily on the sample provided.”
It feels good to actually be done before Sunday, but I had no choice since I will gone this weekend due to it being Memorial weekend. However, I’m hoping the actual IRB application is due next weekend, but if not, I will try to get that done before I head out.
First off, it was great matching faces with names at the meeting the other night. For those who couldn’t make it, I hope to see you another time in the future.
Okay, for this week, I watched the Protecting Human Subjects triad of videos. I wasn’t sure if I was suppose to watch all three videos in one shot or try to complete the CITI modules at the same time. I chose to watch the whole set of videos first. I registered at the CITI website choosing Group 2: Social Behavioral Research Investigators and Key Personnel. Is this correct anyone? I went ahead and completed three modules but only one quiz so far. I’m hoping to complete the whole section this week and then fill out the IRB form.
After countless hours and days of reading, annotating, and writing, liters of caffeinated beverages mixed with sedative beverages by the end of the days, entire forests cleared of their life giving stoic individuals, and probably permanent eye strain, I have completed my literature review. To boot, one day ahead of schedule; albeit, a sick *cough* day might have helped this endeavour. While I hope I did my literature review “right” and that it is comprehensible, I am extremely happy it is done. Trying to distill so much information and synthesize something meaningful from it is truly a formidable task.
That being said, I did find a way to try to use technology to my advantage. Initially, I was printing every single article and annotating the hardcopy. However, I seriously almost went through a ream of paper. I decided there must be a better way. While there is no real way to get out of printing these articles, you don’t always need the entire article. Consequently, I saved the .pdf’s to my folder and then opened them with my Adobe Acrobat Pro software. Then, I read the articles and highlighted, using the built in highlighter, the sections that were applicable. After that, I only printed the pages with highlights, so I could further annotate them on paper. While I still usually printed almost the whole article, I did cumulatively save a ton of paper and ink. Anyway, I thought I would share this for anyone fretting the fading of the ink cartridges. Although, I’m sure most of you will be done with your reviews by the time you read this.
You can peruse my literature review by clicking the link at the top, aptly named Literature Review, or by clicking here.
Well, we are starting to hit the middle of the quarter with the literature review looming ahead; although, it looks as though some people are basically done with this section. I have a good number of articles stockpiled, but I still need several more. So far, it seems as though my four topic areas–Benefits of Open Source Technology in Education for Teachers and Districts, Benefits of Web Based Learning for Students, Benefits of Online Learning for the Subject, and Specific Benefits of Moodle–are shaping up to work for this thesis; albeit, I might be placing the specific benefits of Moodle under a subheading of Benefits of Open Source. I’m not sure yet. I’m still knee deep in actual tagging and reading of sources, so I’ll have more of an idea of what is working and not working once I actually start putting the prose together.
Update: Okay, I think it was Barbara who introduced me to Wordle–thank you. I’m actually thinking of how to use this with my students. Below is my Wordle of my Pre-Thesis